博彩网址平台:Insight - FGV must come clean on excessive remuneration

时间:4周前   阅读:12

皇冠球网www.hg108.vip)是皇冠体育官网线上直营平台。皇冠球网面向亚太地区招募代理,开放皇冠球网代理申请、皇冠球网代理会员开户等业务。皇冠球网可下载皇冠球网APP,皇冠球网APP包括皇冠体育最新代理登录线路、皇冠体育最新会员登录线路。

One recent issue that came into light and has been the talk of the town is none other than the issue surrounding the hike of directors’ fees, more specifically that of the non-independent non-executive chairman (NINEC) of integrated global agri-business organisation FGV Holdings Bhd.

AT a time when the focus on responsible investing is gaining wider acceptance, we should never neglect the “governance” element – “greenwashing” of governance must be avoided at all costs.

Lately, there have been some governance issues that sparked serious concerns among both governance proponents as well the investors’ fraternity which to a certain extent can undermine the integrity of the capital market as well as being not in line with the protection of minority shareholders.

One recent issue that came into light and has been the talk of the town is none other than the issue surrounding the hike of directors’ fees, more specifically that of the non-independent non-executive chairman (NINEC) of integrated global agri-business organisation FGV Holdings Bhd.

Many have expressed views on the issues – spanning from political viewpoints to constructive critici *** – given that FGV is a unique listed entity which still needs to shoulder the interest of *** allholders, the majority of whom are settlers of numerous land schemes belonging to Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) in rural vicinities.

To re-cap, the resolution on the proposed increase of FGV’s NINEC and other non-executive directors (NEDs) remuneration were passed during the company’s recent AGM.

,

博彩网址平台www.99cx.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育网址代理APP下载、皇冠体育网址会员APP下载、皇冠体育网址线路APP下载、皇冠体育网址登录APP下载的官方平台。博彩网址平台上博彩网址平台会员登录线路、博彩网址平台代理网址更新最快。博彩网址平台开放皇冠官方会员注册、皇冠官方代理开户等业务。

,

This is not surprising given that Felda owns more than 80% of FGV and the very fact that the chairman is a board nominee of Felda.

But that doesn’t mean these are acceptable practices. In view of its “unpalatable” financial performance track record, FGV has always been the subject of shareholders unhappiness when it comes to the subject of directors’ remuneration.

The fact that the NINEC decided to waive his RM40,000 yearly fees as chairman of the FGV board’s sustainability committee as well as meeting allowances of RM2,000 per meeting until the next AGM in 2023 following massive public hue and cry over a bump in the remuneration package of the company’s NEDs does not seem to resolve the root cause of the matter.

Even the justification by the Felda chairman citing extraordinary profit due to external circumstances is not seemingly acceptable as this has nothing to do with the performance of the board, hence definitely does not merit any form of reward.

Remuneration policy of NEDs should take into consideration the expected checks and balances role and responsibilities which should relate to business complexity and risks.

The remuneration aspect should also benchmark against other plantation companies and where the directors feel that the proposed remuneration is not in line with the industry practices, a clear justification should be provided. Obviously, the performance of the company should also be looked upon as one of the criteria to justify the increase.

上一篇:USDT交易所程序出租(点击联系我):Bursa Malaysia likely to have hit bottom

下一篇:精彩足球推荐分析:哈利斯泰尔斯新MV浪漫复古 Gucci情人节花样秀恩爱

网友评论